Monday, June 25, 2012

Genetech and personalized medicine


Genetech developed a drug against a specific subset of metastatic breast cancer, called HER2-positive mBC. This drug targets the HER2 receptor and blocks it from activating downstream signals by receptor dimerization. This is an awesome accomplishment, but what is made to sound so exciting, is really just Genetech combining the drugs they already have created, and see if they improve patient outcome even more so. It’s a pretty standard process, if you target the cancer in different ways, you are more likely to destroy the cancerous tissue.  This concept has already been used to combat AIDS by giving people a cocktail of drugs.


The drug they are calling Perjeta (which you have to love these names!) is a combination of  Herceptin (which interferes with HER2, part of the EGF-superfamily) and docetaxel (which interferes with the microtubule cytoskeleton).  The name Perjecta is derived from the concept of “personalized” medicine, where they examine the cancer and see what genes and hence proteins are mutated, and target them specifically to a person. This way if a person does not have a problem with the HER2 protein and pathway, they would not be treated with this drug combination.

Their data will be submitted for presentation at an upcoming medical meeting. And Dr. Barron, chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development  is excited that there is an improvement in survival in the CLEOPATRA (Clinical Evaluation Of Pertuzumab  And TRAstuzumab) study.  There are a whole bunch of side effects which include diarrhea, hair loss, low white blood cell count with or without fever, upset stomach, fatigue, rash and peripheral neuropathy (numbness, tingling or damage to the nerves). The most common Grade 3-4 adverse reactions (rate greater than 2 percent) were low white blood cell count with or without fever, decrease in a certain type of white blood cell, diarrhea, damage to the nerves, and decrease in red blood cell count, weakness and fatigue. But if you survive cancer, I expect people are willing to accept the side effects during treatment. Although, I’m not sure I’d be too excited about damaging my nerves.

Friday, June 22, 2012

What avenues of research are going on in Big Pharma?


Recently I have been looking at pharmaceutical companies and the jobs they are posting. I have a strong background in research, and was thinking of changing career paths.

Interesting what I have discovered is that many of the large companies, such as Abbott Laboratories, Pfeizer, and Eli Lily are all focused to a large extent on research where antibodies are used as treatments for disorders and illnesses.  Now coming from an academic research angle, this surprised me. It seems to me that these larger companies are behind the scientific research that is being done these days. In academia, non-coding RNAs (miRNA siRNA, etc), are the focus. In addition to genomic and proteomic global approaches for individualizing treatments.

So, who do you think are the most innovative companies out there?

clixsense